- Povzetek
-
- Vsaka skupina gre v svojem
razvoju skozi faze, ki jih zaznamujejo povsem določeni
skupinsko-dinamični procesi. Različni avtorji izhajajo pri
opisovanju procesov najpogosteje iz opredeljevanja skupine s
formalnega in po drugi strani z neformalnega vidika. Prototip
formalne skupine je zanje delovna skupina, prototip neformalne pa je
v odnose naravnana skupina. Ko poskušamo s tega vidika uvrstiti
supervizijsko skupino učiteljev, naletimo na nejasnosti, saj bi jo
lahko opredeljevali tako z enega kot z drugega vidika. V resnici bi
lahko trdili, da vladajo prav v vsaki majhni skupini - ne glede na
vsebino svojega dela - neke splošne zakonitosti in zaporedja glede
razvoja komunikacije, izražanja čustev, vzpostavljanja strukture
moči, razporejanja vlog itd. Vendar lahko opazimo, da vsaka skupina
(tudi supervizijska) razvije sebi lasten način in hitrost izražanja,
prepoznavanja in nadaljnega ukvarjanja s temi procesi - v tesni
povezavi s samimi cilji skupine (ki so lahko naravnani v uspešnost
ali v odnose). Specifičnost učiteljev (kot vseh drugih, ki se pri
svojem delu srečujejo s skupinami) je ravno v tem, da je njihova
usmerjenost na procese neločljivo povezana z
uspešnostjo/neuspešnostjo pri delu. Poleg kompetentnosti na
vsebinskem, strokovnem področju, je temeljnega pomena za uspešnost v
razredu prav učiteljeva spretnost v razumevanju in ravnanju s
skupinsko-dinamičnimi procesi razreda kot skupine. Zaradi
značilnosti njihovega dela s skupino je eden od najpomembnejših
ciljev supervizije z učitelji (poleg usmerjenosti na ponujene
tematske sklope) v prvi vrsti prav ozaveščanje, prepoznavanje in
razločevanje procesov znotraj supervizijske skupine (s pomočjo
izkustvenega učenja). V prispevku nameravam osvetliti nekaj
pomembnih točk v razvoju skupinske dinamike supervizijske skupine
učiteljev in ponuditi (praksi) ustreznejši model posameznih
skupinsko-dinamičnih faz v razvoju supervizijske skupine.
-
- Ključne besede:
supervizija, mala skupina, učitelj, skupinska dinamika.
|
- Abstract
The development of each group
passes through specific phases characterised by group dynamics
processes. In describing these processes, authors usually proceed from
first defining the group formally and then informally. On one end we
find the protoype of the formal group which is the work group, on the
other, the informal group which is based on relationships. When trying
to classify the supervision group, we fall short of clarity, since the
supervision group could be defined as being both. We can truly maintain
that each small group - regardless of the content of its work - contains
general rules and sequences of characteristic communication development,
expression of emotions, of establishing power structures, dealing with
success, of the division of roles etc. We can, however, notice that each
group (supervision group not excluded) develops its own characteristic
way and tempo of expression, recognition of and further management of
the process - all closely connected to the objectives of the group
(which can either be success or relationship oriented). The specificity
of teachers (or others involved in group work as part of their
profession) lies in the fact that their focus on the processes is
inseparably linked to the success or failure of their work. Next to
being competent academically and in the professional area, teacher's
skill in understanding and dealing with the group dynamics processes of
the class as a group is essential for his/her success in class. Due to
this feature of their work with the group one of the main aims of
teacher supervision (next to being directed to thematic clusters) is to
make aware of, recognize and distinguish the processes within the
supervision group (experiential learning). The article tries to focus on
certain points in the development of group dynamics of a teacher
supervision group and offers a more suitable model of individual group
dynamics phases in the development of the supervision group.
-
- Key words:
supervision, small group, teacher, group dynamic.
|